Közbeszerzési Hatóság

147. §

147. §

1. In addition to the cases specified in Article 42 (1) and (3) of the AP, the public procurement commissioner shall be prohibited from acting in the public procurement case, if

  1. he has ownership of or indirectly owns a share exceeding 50% in the contracting authority or in an entity which has unlawfully failed to adopt the procurement procedure in its procurement, or own a share in a tenderer or in any other interested entity having initiated the procedure (hereinafter jointly referred to as ‘client organisation’);
  2. he has ownership of or indirectly owns a share exceeding 50% in an entity which maintains regular business relations with the client organisation;
  3. he has been an employee of the client organisation, or has been in any other legal relationship for the purpose of employment therewith, or has held a membership therein, or has been an executive officer or a member of the supervisory board, or has had ownership thereof or indirectly owned a share exceeding 50% therein within the last two years preceding the commencement of the review procedure.

2. Public procurement commissioners shall be prohibited from acting in a public procurement case, if any of their relatives living in the same household[1]

  1. is employed by, or has any other legal relationship for the purpose of employment with the client entity or is a member thereof, or an executive officer or board member thereof;
  2. has ownership of or indirectly owns a share exceeding 50% in the client entity;
  3. is employed by, or has any other legal relationship for the purpose of employment with or is a member of, or an executive officer or board member of an entity which maintains regular business relations with the client entity, or has ownership thereof or indirectly own a share exceeding 50% therein;
  4. works as a civil servant, governmental official, state official for an entity which is either responsible for the supervision of the client entity or is subordinated to it, or has been granting the client entity any support or exclusive rights[2].

3. The public procurement commissioner shall notify without delay and not later than within 3 (three) days the Chairperson of the Public Procurement Arbitration Board, if he is subject to any ground for exclusion pursuant to this Article or Article 42 (1) or (3) of the AP. The public procurement commissioner shall assume disciplinary and financial liability for any failure of or delay in filing such notification.

4. The decision in exclusion cases shall be made by the Chairperson of the Public Procurement Arbitration Board. Where the Chairperson of the Public Procurement Arbitration Board participates in the proceeding as a member of the acting panel, the chairperson of the Public Procurement Authority shall decide on his exclusion.

5. For the purposes of this Act, indirect holding shall mean a share held through the share of another organisation having a share in the client organisation (hereinafter referred to as the ‘intermediate organisation). The proportion of the indirect holding is to be calculated by multiplying the share owned by the entity - which has that indirect holding - in the intermediate organisation by the share owned by the intermediate organisation in the client organisation. Where the share in the intermediate organisation exceeds 50%, it shall be considered full ownership.


[1] This amendment entered into force on 12 December 2015.

[2] This amendment entered into force on 1 July 2016.